PricewaterhouseCoopers' investigation results released — July 17
Video: PricewaterhouseCoopers' investigation results released — July 17
Backgrounder: Investigation timeline — July 17
Backgrounder: Key findings & ICBC's actions — July 17
Backgrounder: What makes a vehicle a write-off? — July 17
Municipalities receive ICBC grants totalling over $4.2 million — July 9
ICBC today released the findings of the PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) independent investigation into the sale of vehicles repaired at ICBC’s Burnaby-based research and training facility.
PwC was retained by ICBC to conduct an independent, external investigation while the corporation was conducting its own internal investigation into concerns that some vehicles repaired at the facility were sold with a repair history that was incorrectly documented and not disclosed to buyers.
“PricewaterhouseCoopers has thoroughly investigated the issues at our research and training facility,” said ICBC interim president and CEO Geri Prior. “We are committed to implementing all the recommendations in their report.”
The PwC report substantiated ICBC’s initial findings that there was a general lack of controls and conflicting policies and procedures regarding the appropriate vehicle designation and around employee purchase of vehicles repaired at the facility. PwC’s investigation found instances where personal vehicles were repaired at the R&T facility. In addition, the report found that appropriate actions were not taken by the management responsible when concerns were raised about the facility prior to January, 2008.
“ICBC takes these findings very seriously,” said Prior. “ICBC has been proactive and up front about this investigation from the beginning and we are committed to making things right for our customers.”
PwC has made a number of recommendations to ensure that ICBC’s policies and procedures are comprehensive and consistent, and updated on a regular basis. Other recommendations include restricting the number of staff with the authority to update salvage designations and developing and implementing standards for conducting internal reviews including escalation requirements and documentation standards.
Since announcing its own investigation into the research and training facility February 13, ICBC has taken the following actions (see backgrounder for more detailed list):
“Our employees are hard working, dedicated professionals who strive to do their best for our customers every day and we are committed to working with them as we implement these changes,” added Prior.
“I am pleased that senior executive acted quickly and decisively, first to fully investigate this issue and then to make changes to prevent this from happening again,” said Richard Turner, ICBC board chair.
Once ICBC completed its initial investigation, it reviewed other areas in the company that were involved in vehicle designation and/or the sale of vehicles.
This further review found that, over 10 years, 91 vehicles were sold through ICBC's Salvage operations without the proper disclosure of repair history or registration status. Unlike vehicles from the research and training facility, there were no employee purchases. These vehicles were repaired by external collision repair shops and sold through ICBC's standard salvage sales process to licensed salvage buyers.
"ICBC regrets the inconvenience that this has caused our customers and we apologize," said Prior.
ICBC will be contacting customers who purchased these vehicles to have their vehicles inspected, properly designated and, when appropriate, provide compensation. Not all of these vehicles are currently registered.
PwC's report and background information outlining the chronology of ICBC's and PwC's investigations is available at www.icbc.com.
Media contact:
Doug Henderson
604-982-1332
January 2008
January 24
January 25
January 29
February 12
February 13
February 18
February 13 – March 19
February 26
February 28 - March 3
March 11
March 19
April 4
April 15
April 16
April 17
May 14
July 17
| Key findings from PricewaterhouseCoopers investigation | ICBC actions |
| Total of 55 vehicles repaired at the research and training facility were purchased by ICBC employees and connected parties. | ICBC employees and members of their immediate family are not permitted to purchase any ICBC salvage, either directly or indirectly. The research and training facility no longer repairs vehicles for sale. |
| Lack of controls and documentation regarding the employee purchase of vehicles. Internal policies on purchasing salvage were contradictory. |
Updated Code of Ethics to clarify employee purchases of salvage. Additional Code of Ethics training for all employees will begin in early Fall 2008. Annual review of the Code of Ethics by all employees in the company. All new employees will continue to receive an introduction to ICBC’s Code of Ethics. |
| Several contradictory or unclear policies, such as the principles relating to conflicts of interest and the purchasing of salvage vehicles or corporate property by ICBC employees and/or connected parties. | ICBC employees and members of their immediate family are not permitted to purchase any ICBC salvage, either directly or indirectly. |
| Inaccurate accounting for vehicle acquisition, repair and sale costs. If costs were accurately calculated, unlikely ICBC would have recovered its costs. |
The research and training facility no longer repairs vehicles for sale. |
| Employee use of the research and training facility to repair or service vehicles was limited. No policies that dealt directly with repair of personal vehicles. |
Personal use of the research and training facility by employees not permitted, under any circumstances. The research and training facility is now used strictly for business purposes - to conduct research and training. |
| Changes to vehicle designations and claims payment codes at research and training facility meant vehicle purchasers were not fully aware of the extent of damage to the vehicle. Policies relating to determining vehicle designations and claims payment codes were unclear. |
Comprehensive review of relevant policies and procedures – changes where required. Training and communication for employees on new policies/procedures under way. Completed detailed review of other areas in the company where vehicles were being sold. Identified vehicles sold from ICBC’s regular salvage operations with incorrect vehicle registration status. In process of contacting customers. Policy and procedure changes to address issues at the research and training facility will also address the vehicle designation issue with these vehicles. Working to allow Vehicle Identification Number look up on icbc.com. Committed to implementing all of the recommendations in the PwC report. |
| Concerns about practices at the research and training facility were reported on three previous occasions, but were not appropriately investigated and not escalated to CEO. | Those in line of authority who allowed the system of vehicle purchases to develop and continue are no longer with the company. Reporting for internal investigations section of ICBC’s Special Investigations Unit moved to Employee Relations. Improvements to risk governance including reporting processes and management training. |
What makes a vehicle a write-off or, in insurance terms, a total loss?
After a crash, ICBC must decide if it makes sense to repair the vehicles. This is done in one of two ways:
Example:
ICBC would consider your vehicle a total loss because it would cost $8,000 to fix your vehicle, compared to the $7,000 it would cost ICBC if we paid you $10,000 and recovered $3,000 by selling your damaged vehicle as salvage.
After a vehicle is identified as a total loss, ICBC’s Salvage Department gives it one of four designations:
These internal designations are used to trigger the appropriate status in the Vehicle Registration System – the information the public sees.
What’s the difference between the designations?
What went wrong at the Research and Training facility?
The damage history of 94 vehicles repaired at the research and training facility was not properly documented and disclosed. This means the true repair state of the vehicle was not reflected in the vehicle registration system – the information the public sees.
This was done one of two ways:
The practice of some employees and managers purchasing vehicles was condoned by a specific line of authority within ICBC. While this practice did not explicitly violate ICBC's policies and procedures, it resulted in inappropriate actions and the appearance of a conflict of interest. This management group also condoned the improper use of the facility.
When previous concerns were raised, appropriate action was not taken by the management responsible.
How could this happen?
There was a lack of clear and specific policies and procedures to govern the designation, repair and sale of vehicles at the facility.
There was a general lack of controls, and conflicting policies and procedures regarding the employee purchase of vehicles repaired at the facility.
The practice of selling repaired vehicles to employees and related parties was condoned by a specific line of authority within ICBC.
Some individuals within a specific line of authority did not demonstrate proper judgment. No one within that line of authority is still with the company.
What is ICBC doing to make sure this never happens again?
ICBC has already taken steps to make sure nothing like this happens again, and we are committed to implementing all of the recommendations in the PwC report.
Action taken to date:
Thirty-one British Columbia cities, districts, and municipalities will receive ICBC grants in place of real property and business taxes, totalling over $4.2 million this year.
As a provincial Crown corporation, ICBC is not required to pay business and property taxes. Instead, communities receive annual grants that are equal to the taxes that would be levied if ICBC were a private business.
Grants are paid to communities with ICBC claim centres, administrative offices, and storage and salvage yards. The municipal grants vary according to size and location of the premises, and differences in local mill rates.
The following is a list of 2008 ICBC grants in place of taxes to be paid:
| Abbotsford | $145,478 |
| Burnaby | $287,551 |
| Campbell River | $ 8,234 |
| Chilliwack | $ 87,425 |
| Courtenay | $ 75,002 |
| Coquitlam | $447,691 |
| Cranbrook | $ 12,791 |
| Dawson Creek | $ 13,313 |
| Fort St. John | $ 10,356 |
| Kamloops | $ 59,703 |
| Kelowna | $108,353 |
| Langford | $ 36,343 |
| Langley (City) | $ 66,298 |
| Maple Ridge | $ 70,806 |
| Nanaimo | $114,226 |
| New Westminster | $327,725 |
| North Vancouver (City) | $867,355 |
| North Vancouver (District) | $172,254 |
| Penticton | $ 23,725 |
| Prince George | $101,176 |
| Prince Rupert | $ 18,975 |
| Quesnel | $ 10,196 |
| Richmond | $285,284 |
| Saanich | $ 80,037 |
| Smithers | $ 41,519 |
| Surrey | $170,217 |
| Terrace | $ 21,378 |
| Trail | $ 28,541 |
| Vancouver | $376,018 |
| Vernon | $ 28,527 |
| Victoria | $178,774 |
Media contact:
Doug Henderson
604-982-1332